A lot of people have sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. That oath is not vacated with a discharge from military service. The 2nd amendment is part of the Constitution. In today’s world, the proliferation of technology that is impacting on People leaves them all dazed with little ability to keep up with issues that impact their lives. So many issues are tossed in the air, people can’t focus well enough to make an EMOTIONAL decision. While they are evaluating one issue ,the politician sneaks another one in. Get-em all hipped up on one thing and run the one they really want through late Friday afternoon.

  The United States is back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales. A statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of the George W. Bush administration which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. Obama has taken the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States.

The Obama administration intends to force gun control along with bans on all weapons or what they construe as such. This can all be done through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control that can be amended to include anything they consider a “WEAPON” the Obama administration can use the State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to gun laws created by foreign governments.

The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all privately held firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will vacate our 2nd Amendment. How? Through no publicized gun control debate in the media or votes in Congress. Before Americans understand what has happened, the Secretary of State commits the U.S. to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. These Treaties could stop firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. Who is behind it? A list of names would include anyone pushing for one world government using the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg to push it in the U.S..

If an awareness of this is not brought in to the public discourse we will wake up another morning and find that the State Department has signed Treaties  that requires the public to bring any firearm in their possession to the local government for destruction or face imprisonment. Never happen, you say. Look what went on in Australia. Their government just quickly passed a law. The Australians had no second amendment to protect them. They had to bring in their firearms for destruction, end of story. This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care has been forced on us by the Obama administration, so will gun control.

The only way we can stop this is through education. Teach the politician we, the people ,will toss them off the gravy train, and educate ourselves issue by issue or work on ONE, know it and promote it every chance you get. Go to

Please paste this in an email and forward it to others who may be concerned with the direction that our country is headed.

Guns, People and Life

The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution listed in the Bill of Rights; “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

What is so hard to understand? Why do supposed educated people go on pedantic tirades trying to get around these 27 simple straight forward words. Maybe they don’t know the definition of  infringe;

A verb:

1. the statute infringed constitutionally guaranteed rights: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; disobey, defy, flout, fly in the face of; disregard, ignore, neglect; go beyond, overstep, exceed; Law infract. ANTONYMS obey, comply with.

2. the surveillance infringed on his rights: restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on; undermine, erode, diminish, weaken, impair, damage, compromise.

It’s not the guns, it’s the person in control of the gun. No amount of gun law will stop a determined evildoer. So let us waste no more time and start looking at the real cause, PEOPLE.

Boston, a great example of INFRINGED. Mass. law makes it all but impossible to have firearms for personal protection or hunting. A permit for carrying a concealed firearm is tough and expensive. To drive through the state with firearms, you put your freedom at risk. Back to Boston where hundreds of thousands of law-abiding  citizens were locked down in their homes after the Marathon bombing with no means to protect themselves. How many thought, I wish I had a gun? But, the people of Mass. keep voting in the same control sucking thieves that keep passing anti-gun laws. Those two murdering bombers weren’t concerned about permits or firearms licenses. Now, if they decided to enter a home after executing a university law enforcement officer, what chance do the home occupants have? How many sat in their home at the request of the authorities wishing they had a gun? Mass. people just keep voting in the same old paid-off politicians that won’t let-em have guns by making it hard and expensive to obtain one.

Let’s start at the top as in those who THINK they will benefit the most. Here is where it’s easy to get off on CONSPIRACY THEORY. Let’s not. People in general develop attitudes on a variety of issues that grow from groups within an issue. These issues, for the most, are created from NOT well thought out FEELINGS usually put forth EMOTIONALLY.

The politician senses these FEELINGS. They smell VOTES, but care nothing for the people, the issue or anything else except VOTES. Often they scoff at the issue and those pushing it. Guns are PART of a movement toward CONTROLLING a population. It’s easier as GUNS are more emotional.

It’s hard to control an armed population. Hitler, Stalin, name a dictator and you will find that only after disarming the people could they or did they take full control. It’s not just guns it’s every area of society that is under attack, education, food, health care and transportation. All of which are broken down in smaller sub-areas that make it harder to understand. We can’t make good decisions trying to understand 28,000 word legislation.

The Constitution of the U. S. is under constant attack by people who seek control over the population. What do they hope to achieve? I have no idea what the end game is, but control is the direction they are going in. Who are THEY?  Once again I have no clear idea, but THEY rely on large populations of slaves, who in ,turn rely on THEM for benefits. Reliances include everything from medical, dope (Methadone), the EBT card has cash for weed to food, phones and housing. All sounding like well-meaning government programs, but the “programs” turn into slave generators that keep people living on Section 8 or in large  public housing projects, spending their time going to the Methadone clinic and getting their the EBT-card charged so they can get more cheap hi-carbohydrate food, smokes and what have you. These are people living in fear. Fear of loss, that keeps them voting for those who maintain them in the manner in which they grew up in or have become accustom to. Slaves to politicians who once the politician  gets what they want won’t need their votes or them anymore. They will become disposable and a burden that must go.

More Latter, Yours, jeffrey