The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution listed in the Bill of Rights; “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
What is so hard to understand? Why do supposed educated people go on pedantic tirades trying to get around these 27 simple straight forward words. Maybe they don’t know the definition of infringe;
1. the statute infringed constitutionally guaranteed rights: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; disobey, defy, flout, fly in the face of; disregard, ignore, neglect; go beyond, overstep, exceed; Law infract. ANTONYMS obey, comply with.
2. the surveillance infringed on his rights: restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on; undermine, erode, diminish, weaken, impair, damage, compromise.
It’s not the guns, it’s the person in control of the gun. No amount of gun law will stop a determined evildoer. So let us waste no more time and start looking at the real cause, PEOPLE.
Boston, Mass.is a great example of INFRINGED. Mass. law makes it all but impossible to have firearms for personal protection or hunting. A permit for carrying a concealed firearm is tough and expensive. To drive through the state with firearms, you put your freedom at risk. Back to Boston where hundreds of thousands of law-abiding citizens were locked down in their homes after the Marathon bombing with no means to protect themselves. How many thought, I wish I had a gun? But, the people of Mass. keep voting in the same control sucking thieves that keep passing anti-gun laws. Those two murdering bombers weren’t concerned about permits or firearms licenses. Now, if they decided to enter a home after executing a university law enforcement officer, what chance do the home occupants have? How many sat in their home at the request of the authorities wishing they had a gun? Mass. people just keep voting in the same old paid-off politicians that won’t let-em have guns by making it hard and expensive to obtain one.
Let’s start at the top as in those who THINK they will benefit the most. Here is where it’s easy to get off on CONSPIRACY THEORY. Let’s not. People in general develop attitudes on a variety of issues that grow from groups within an issue. These issues, for the most, are created from NOT well thought out FEELINGS usually put forth EMOTIONALLY.
The politician senses these FEELINGS. They smell VOTES, but care nothing for the people, the issue or anything else except VOTES. Often they scoff at the issue and those pushing it. Guns are PART of a movement toward CONTROLLING a population. It’s easier as GUNS are more emotional.
It’s hard to control an armed population. Hitler, Stalin, name a dictator and you will find that only after disarming the people could they or did they take full control. It’s not just guns it’s every area of society that is under attack, education, food, health care and transportation. All of which are broken down in smaller sub-areas that make it harder to understand. We can’t make good decisions trying to understand 28,000 word legislation.
The Constitution of the U. S. is under constant attack by people who seek control over the population. What do they hope to achieve? I have no idea what the end game is, but control is the direction they are going in. Who are THEY? Once again I have no clear idea, but THEY rely on large populations of slaves, who in ,turn rely on THEM for benefits. Reliances include everything from medical, dope (Methadone), the EBT card has cash for weed to food, phones and housing. All sounding like well-meaning government programs, but the “programs” turn into slave generators that keep people living on Section 8 or in large public housing projects, spending their time going to the Methadone clinic and getting their the EBT-card charged so they can get more cheap hi-carbohydrate food, smokes and what have you. These are people living in fear. Fear of loss, that keeps them voting for those who maintain them in the manner in which they grew up in or have become accustom to. Slaves to politicians who once the politician gets what they want won’t need their votes or them anymore. They will become disposable and a burden that must go.
More Latter, Yours, jeffrey